Thursday, November 12, 2009
Neuromancer ending
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Frameworks of Neuromancer
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Chiba City Blues
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
chronology and Point of view
In the first section of the story, it is written in third person omniscient. This part of the story is characterized by the tale of a man being led to hang on the bridge. This part also sets up the location of the incident and gives a little background into the story. I feel that the third person point of view adds to the mystery behind the story. This part of the story is interesting because the reader does not know who the convicted man is or why he is in this position. The third person point of view also adds a sense that something bad is going to happen. This part of the story ends with the captain and sergeant walk away from the creek and it is implied that the main character is hung.
In the second part of the story, the point of view is also in third person. The chronology is interesting in this section because it goes back about a week to our main character Mr. Farquhar is on his plantation in the south talking to a confederate soldier. This is where we learn the consequences of going to the Owl Creek Bridge is being hung. We also learn that Mr. Farquhar is a federal spy from the north.
The third part of this story is by far the most interesting and disturbing part of this story. The story changes into an odd mix of third person and first person. This is symbolic because Mr. Farquhar is all mixed up because thinks that he is alive through this whole part even though he is actually hanging from the bridge dead. The chronology of this part is correct however, because this is at the end of the story, and at the end of his life.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Poetry in pop culture
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Machines of "Loving" Grace
The first piece of evidence that made me think that this was an anti- technological poem was when he was talking about machines and animals living together in perfect harmony. I found this to be rather sarcastic seeing that this would be impossible. Also I find it sarcastic because it is seen through history that with the implementation of newer and newer technology, nature seems to be taking the brunt of the negative outcome via pollution or neglect.
The second main part of the poem which led me to believe that this poem was anti-technology was the last stanza. At this point in the poem, Brautigan had gone through and explained how he would love for nature and technology to be intertwined. But in his last stanza he changes his perspectives. near the end of the stanza he says that he wishes for a labor-free world where we can be with our brothers and sisters where we can all be watched over by machines “of loving grace.” To me, this sounds like he is wary of a “Big Brother” society where everything we do is watched over by cameras and computers.
On the other hand however, some aspects of this poem can be taken in another light. For instance that last line about being “watched over”. I feel it can mean that now that we do in fact have all of these new technologies we can leave all of the mundane tasks to them and we can now go outside and enjoy nature. Also he explains that he wishes for a society where technology and nature can co-exist in harmony. With the implementation of cleaner and “greener” technology coming out, I think Brautigan saw the pattern of technology and its environmental footprint when he wrote this and hoped for a day that technology won’t have to harm the environment. In this aspect I think that he is pro- technology and really truly wanted to see “clean technology,”
Personally I found this poem to be on the anti-technology side. The piece of the poem that made me think this were the first two stanzas which spoke of technology and nature living in harmony seemed very sarcastic. Seeing the past history of technological application and how it effects nature.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Casabianca symbolism
deck, him, flame, wreck, dead, storm, blood, creature, form, flames, word, father, death, voice, task, chieftain, son, shots, breath, hair, fires, ship, flag, child, banners, thunder, sound, winds, sea, mast, helm, pennon, thing, heart
The piece of imagery that I find most symbolic in this poem is the fire. All throughout the poem fire is mentioned. At first, the fire is menacing, but not a very big threat. By the end of the poem however, the fire becomes the main antagonist of the story, eventually burning away the ship, the boy and his father. I believe that the fire may represent all of the burdens that we all must undertake in life. I see this because in the poem, Hemans says,
“And shouted but once more aloud,
My father! must I stay?
While o'er him fast, through sail and shroud,
The wreathing fires made way.”
I take this as meaning that even though he he wants no more than to leave, he stays because he knows that he has to stay through what his father says. Through this the fire is making everything that he does harder, burdening him and costing precious time and putting his life at danger.
Another important symbol that is in this poem is the boat. This poem could have been set in any place. I feel that this setting is put in place to stress the helplessness of the boy in the story. Let’s face it, there is basically no way to get away from a fire on a boat. This setting is also put into place to show the significance of the fire because it brings it to the forefront of the reader’s mind.
As a whole, I interpreted this poem to be an allegory of adolescence. The boy is constantly waiting for his father’s approval just like all adolescent boys do. It is always a criteria for young men to have the approval of their father, this is seen in many lines throughout the poem. Also the flames in this poem help represent the transition in his life because at the end, it says a line about the noblest thing that perished was “that young, faithful heart.